What it takes to join the ranks of the world’s richest 1%

This article was written by Michael Yardney, who I have known for many years as one of Australia’s best property development educators and advisors. You can follow his commentary by subscribing to his newsletter at www.propertyupdate.com.au

 

I can see 2011 going down as a year that will be remembered for civil unrest.

It started with a street vendor setting fire to himself in Tunisia and moved on to civil unrest in a number of countries in the Middle East. Then there were riots in London and, more recently, protests around the world against the richest 1%.

The protesters say they are opposed to “the fundamental inequality in society — social, economic, ecological — and want to change the ways that our society is structured and run so that way, the vast majority of people — the 99% — have their interests accounted for, their voices heard, their needs represented.”

As many of these protestors claim our society is run for and by “the 1%”, I found it interesting to read an article explaining exactly what it takes to join this exclusive club in a recent copy of the Australian Financial Review.

 

And by the time I finish explaining how to join the ranks of world’s richest 1%, you may find you’re already in it. But I’m getting ahead of myself…

What it takes to make it into the Rich1% Club.
Apparently it takes assets of $11.2 million to be amongst the richest 1% of Australia’s 8.4 million households.

The top 1% has a lazy $1.07 million kicking around in cash or it’s equivalent according to the Australian Financial Review. That compares with just less than $120,000 for the top 20% of households.

The average value of cars owned by the top 1% is $84,000; compared with $32,000 for the top 20%. And their financial security is covered by $1.4 million in superannuation, more than double the super held by the wealthiest 20 per cent.

Those who make it in the top 1% of rich people tend to have extensive share portfolios, worth $450,000 and have a business valued at an average price of  $3milion.

This is in line with the Merrill Lynch Cap Gemini report of High Net Worth Individuals that found 80% of this club made their wealth through business.

But that doesn’t mean that the wealthiest Australians don’t like property – they do and they are amongst the keenest property owners in the world.

If you are in one of those 84,000 households that make up the 1%, you are likely to live in a house worth on average $1.9 million and own other property holdings worth over $3milliion.

Now clearly there is a wide gap between the top 1% and the average Australian and figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics show that Australia’s richest households are expanding their wealth three times faster than the poorest groups, and many are using property to leverage their wealth. I wrote about it here in a recent market commentary.

Another Perspective.

No one’s hardship should be belittled. Becoming unemployed or not being able to keep up your mortgage payments aren’t just financial problems. They’re social and emotional problems that strike at your sense of worth.

But things always need to be kept in perspective. Some really interesting numbers emerge when you expand your view and look at the richest 1% in the entire world.

It’s no secret that Australia is among the richest nations on Earth, so how much do you need to earn to be among the top 1% of the world?

According to an article by Motley Fool in Motley Fool the answer is US$34,000.

This article explains that in his book The Haves and the Have-Nots, World Bank economist Branko Milanovic shares that be in the top half of the globe, you need to earn just $1,225 a year.

To be included in the top 20% of income earners in the world all you need is a salary of US$5,000 per year. To be the top 10% you would need to earn US $12,000 a year. And to be included in the top 0.1% requires an annual income of US $70,000.

Dig even deeper and the figures become unconceivable.

According to the U.N., “Nearly half the world’s population, 2.8 billion people, earns less than $2 a day.” According to the World Bank, 95% of those living in the developing world earn less than $10 a day.

When you consider the context of the entire world, it means that the Australians we consider poor are among some of the world’s richest people.

A new report from Credit Suisse Global Wealth has revealed what many of us Aussies already know; that we are indeed living in the lucky country!

In term of average wealth per adult in 2011, Switzerland, Australia and Norway are the three richest nations in the world, with the average Australian worth close to $221,704, which is four times more than that amount boasted by each US adult. And the proportion of Australian adults who can claim a worth of more than $100,000 is eight times the global average. 

In short, most of those occupying Wall Street or Melbourne or Sydney would be considered extraordinarily wealthy by much of the world.

Many of those protesting the 1% are, in fact, the 1%.

Apart from having amongst the highest incomes in the world and the second best lifestyle, the ABS advises we also have one of the highest life expectancies on the planet.

Since 1990 six years has been added to the life expectancy of Australian males and four years has been added to the life expectancy for women. 

Anyone can join the 1% club.
But the protestors in Australia should remember that we live in the best country in the world. A country of opportunity where virtually anyone can make it into the BRW Rich 200 list. 

Clearly that’s just not possible in many other parts of the world.

Just look at this year’s Rich 200 List…

While 17 percent inherited some of their fortune, most were self made successes, some coming from working class backgrounds.

And there’s no use complaining about the school you went to, because attending a private school and having an elite education is clearly not a prerequisite to joining Australia’s wealthy. While some forged important networks at school, many went to public schools and others didn’t even finish high school. In fact less than half of those in the Rich 200 list have tertiary qualifications. 

And don’t say it’s too late…

You’re never too young and you’re never too old. The youngest member of this year’s BRW Rich 200 is aged 35 and has an estimated wealth of $1.01 billion, which is even more than the oldest member who at the age of 92 has accumulated $289 million.

Some final thoughts.
Just to make things clear – this isn’t to belittle the protestors’ message. I see merits in some of the Occupy protestors’ arguments.

And I’m definitely not against protesting – I grew up in the age of protests against the Vietnam War.

Needless to say I can understand why people would be upset when many of top 1% are perceived to have earned their income unjustifiably. Being paid by big corporations that in some cases have been run into the ground and then been bailed out by their governments doesn’t sound right.

Nor does a tax system where the wealthy seem to avoid tax and the poor seem to pay a disproportionate amount.

It’s hard to argue with that logic.

Remember…I’m not having a go at the protestors.

The Occupy Wall Street movement has attracted support around the world and many believe they have a genuine grievance. High flyers in the world of finance helped create the Global Financial Crisis and the poor of the world are now paying for it.

I’m just offering another perspective and reminding them that even though our system has lots of faults, it has created more prosperity, even for the lowest 1%, than most of the world can comprehend.

 

Advertisements

One Response to “What it takes to join the ranks of the world’s richest 1%”

  1. Ram Kumar Says:

    This is a valid insight. Australia’s success lies in her ability to be really productive rather than showcasing imaginery affluence with derivatives of underlying with no intrinsic value. Speaking with percentages may mislead and obscure the really lopsided concentration of wealth when the data pertains to billions of people. Absolute number of billionaires, for example, when compared against world population throws more light on the disparity. I would also reiterate that we can’t assume they made their money unethically. But they may be well advised to show social responsibility by lifting up those at the very bottom of the society leaving the others to try to come up on their own efforts. Emphasis should be on productivity by all. This may be the only way out of the current economic mess.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: